Loading on/off…
How ORL played per 100 possessions with each player on the floor and off it. 2024-25 regular season, 82 games.
| Player | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9,098 | 2,283 | +0.9 | −0.7 | +1.6±7.6 | +2.4 | +1.3 | −0.3 | +0.12 | +0.16 | 53rd | |
| 8,175 | 2,038 | +5.3 | −5.6 | +11.0±7.4 | +9.0 | +6.0 | −4.9 | +0.04 | +0.13 | 96th | |
| 7,248 | 1,807 | −0.7 | +1.1 | −1.9±7.4 | −2.3 | −3.1 | −1.3 | +0.22 | +0.13 | 34th | |
| 6,951 | 1,736 | +0.2 | +0.3 | −0.1±7.5 | −0.6 | +0.1 | +0.2 | +0.15 | +0.17 | 44th | |
| 6,234 | 1,556 | −0.7 | +0.9 | −1.7±7.5 | −2.9 | +0.5 | +2.1 | +0.17 | +0.16 | 35th | |
| 6,120 | 1,537 | −3.7 | +2.9 | −6.6±7.6 | −4.3 | −1.7 | +5.0 | +0.19 | +0.14 | 10th | |
| 5,601 | 1,417 | +3.7 | −1.7 | +5.4±7.7 | +4.9 | +3.0 | −2.4 | +0.08 | +0.11 | 84th | |
| 4,709 | 1,178 | −1.5 | +1.0 | −2.5±8.0 | 0.0 | +1.2 | +3.6 | +0.18 | +0.15 | 31st | |
| 4,381 | 1,100 | −0.8 | +0.6 | −1.4±8.2 | +0.4 | −2.0 | −0.6 | +0.08 | +0.12 | 36th | |
| 4,060 | 996 | +0.7 | +0.1 | +0.7±8.4 | +0.9 | −3.7 | −4.4 | +0.26 | +0.15 | 48th | |
| 2,820 | 697 | +6.2 | −1.1 | +7.3±9.6 | +3.3 | +2.6 | −4.7 | +0.10 | +0.09 | 90th | |
| 2,529 | 639 | −1.1 | +0.5 | −1.7±10.0 | −4.4 | −0.6 | +1.1 | +0.01 | +0.11 | 35th | |
| 2,481 | 608 | −5.9 | +1.4 | −7.4±10.1 | −6.7 | −4.6 | +2.7 | +0.12 | +0.09 | 7th | |
| 2,222 | 547 | −2.6 | +0.7 | −3.4±10.5 | −2.5 | −2.4 | +0.9 | −0.05 | +0.12 | 26th | |
| 2,160 | 539 | +2.1 | −0.1 | +2.2±10.7 | +1.3 | +3.2 | +1.1 | +0.19 | +0.13 | 59th | |
| 1,451 | 360 | −9.2 | +1.2 | −10.4±12.6 | −7.0 | −4.3 | +6.1 | −0.01 | +0.13 | — |
Swing is on net minus off net. The ± figure is the 95% range from sampling noise, so a +4 swing with ±8 could easily be zero. Small sample marks fewer than 1,000 possessions on or off, which covers every clutch split. Teammates and opponents are average regular-season DRBL/100 ratings of the players on the floor with him.
Pick two regulars to split the season into the four ways they shared the floor.
Both on
+4.7
ORtg 112.1 · DRtg 107.4
5,414 poss · ±6.2
Caldwell-Pope without Wagner
−4.7
ORtg 107.9 · DRtg 112.7
3,684 poss · ±7.5
Wagner without Caldwell-Pope
+6.5
ORtg 113.9 · DRtg 107.4
2,761 poss · ±8.8
Both off
−6.6
ORtg 105.3 · DRtg 111.9
3,389 poss · ±7.9
| Lineup | Min | TOV% | ORB% | FT rate | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carter Jr. · Wagner · Banchero · Joseph · Caldwell-Pope | 821 | 204 | 116.7 | 108.1 | +8.7±16 | 56.0% | 12.1% | 23.4% | 17% | 54.6% |
| Carter Jr. · Anthony · Wagner · Banchero · Caldwell-Pope | 745 | 188 | 118.8 | 107.6 | +11.2±17 | 54.3% | 11.4% | 31.1% | 19% | 53.4% |
| Bitadze · Wagner · Suggs · da Silva · Caldwell-Pope | 599 | 151 | 108.3 | 110.7 | −2.4±19 | 51.3% | 14.7% | 30.1% | 16% | 54.1% |
| Carter Jr. · Bitadze · Suggs · da Silva · Caldwell-Pope | 330 | 84 | 104.8 | 103.6 | +1.2±25 | 51.3% | 20.0% | 36.9% | 11% | 55.3% |
| Carter Jr. · Wagner · Suggs · Banchero · Caldwell-Pope | 319 | 76 | 106.8 | 111.4 | −4.6±26 | 50.0% | 12.4% | 20.7% | 23% | 52.9% |
| Carter Jr. · Bitadze · Wagner · Suggs · Caldwell-Pope | 293 | 74 | 129.5 | 98.0 | +31.5±27 | 65.6% | 17.8% | 34.0% | 24% | 55.6% |
| Carter Jr. · Wagner · Banchero · Black · Caldwell-Pope | 258 | 65 | 89.1 | 104.6 | −15.6±27 | 44.1% | 20.3% | 26.2% | 25% | 49.2% |
| Bitadze · Anthony · Houstan · da Silva · Caldwell-Pope | 255 | 71 | 103.9 | 102.4 | +1.5±29 | 46.9% | 10.9% | 28.6% | 9% | 48.0% |
| Bitadze · Anthony · Wagner · Banchero · Caldwell-Pope | 243 | 58 | 108.3 | 96.7 | +11.6±28 | 51.8% | 13.3% | 26.2% | 14% | 48.1% |
| Bitadze · Wagner · Banchero · Black · Caldwell-Pope | 201 | 51 | 96.1 | 114.1 | −18.1±32 | 47.8% | 17.6% | 30.4% | 12% | 55.6% |
| Isaac · Wagner · Suggs · Black · Harris | 180 | 45 | 85.7 | 91.0 | −5.3±33 | 40.1% | 20.9% | 23.4% | 30% | 52.2% |
| Carter Jr. · Anthony · Banchero · da Silva · Caldwell-Pope | 173 | 42 | 91.9 | 118.4 | −26.5±34 | 39.0% | 8.1% | 26.3% | 14% | 55.3% |
| Bitadze · Wagner · Black · da Silva · Caldwell-Pope | 160 | 43 | 115.9 | 105.1 | +10.7±36 | 51.9% | 7.3% | 18.2% | 19% | 44.4% |
| Bitadze · Queen · Suggs · da Silva · Caldwell-Pope | 158 | 39 | 102.5 | 85.9 | +16.6±35 | 51.4% | 20.0% | 28.9% | 16% | 49.2% |
| Isaac · Bitadze · Wagner · Black · da Silva | 137 | 34 | 108.8 | 121.7 | −12.9±39 | 43.2% | 8.8% | 36.6% | 26% | 53.2% |
| Isaac · Wagner · Suggs · Black · Howard | 106 | 26 | 96.2 | 105.6 | −9.4±46 | 58.1% | 36.5% | 45.0% | 19% | 50.0% |
| Carter Jr. · Suggs · Banchero · Caldwell-Pope · Harris | 93 | 22 | 123.4 | 115.2 | +8.2±45 | 55.3% | 12.8% | 31.6% | 42% | 59.0% |
| Isaac · Bitadze · Wagner · Black · Caldwell-Pope | 92 | 23 | 115.6 | 119.1 | −3.6±47 | 66.2% | 15.6% | 0.0% | 21% | 57.3% |
| Isaac · Wagner · Wagner · Black · Caldwell-Pope | 91 | 24 | 125.0 | 116.3 | +8.7±50 | 55.6% | 10.4% | 30.4% | 22% | 62.9% |
| Carter Jr. · Wagner · Suggs · da Silva · Caldwell-Pope | 90 | 22 | 104.4 | 124.4 | −20.0±50 | 50.0% | 8.9% | 8.7% | 18% | 58.8% |
Most-used groups with at least 40 possessions. Lineup net ratings swing a lot in a few hundred possessions, so lean on the four factors as much as the net figure.
Ratings are points per 100 possessions, built from play-by-play with every possession tagged by the ten players on the floor. Filtered leaves out garbage time and possessions that start with 2 seconds or less on the clock. Garbage time is the closing run of a fourth quarter with two or fewer starters on the floor and a lead of at least 25 with more than 9 minutes left, 20 with 6 to 9 minutes left, or 10 inside 6 minutes. Clutch follows the NBA definition: the last five minutes of the fourth quarter or overtime with the score within five.
Teammate and opponent quality average each player's season DRBL/100 over the possessions they played. It shows whether someone's minutes came with stronger lineups or against them. Players without a DRBL rating are left out of the average. Playoff splits use the same regular-season ratings and have no league rank, since playoff teams play anywhere from 4 to 28 games.
Luck-adjusted sets opponents' 3-point and free-throw percentages to league average, since defenses shape those shots but have little say in whether they fall. The range covers about 95% of the outcomes you would get from possession-to-possession noise alone.
On/off follows the whole lineup. Teammates, opponents and the players who replace him all move it, so read it as context for a player's value. It does not measure that value by itself.