| 61.5% |
| 2009-10 | 16.3 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 60.1% |
Under which conditions does this player change? Rates from Σ/Σ.
Difference vs season baseline (per game / rate). Sample size shown.
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | TS% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 44 | 1168 | +0.6 | +0.0 | +0.1 | +2.4pp | +1.8pp | +3.2pp | +0.1 |
| Away | 43 | 1132 | -0.6 | -0.0 | -0.1 | -2.5pp | -1.9pp | -3.3pp | -0.1 |
| Wins | 57 | 1478 | +0.1 | +0.1 | +0.1 | +0.1pp | -0.8pp | -0.1pp | +0.1 |
| Losses | 30 | 822 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.3pp | +1.5pp | +0.2pp | -0.1 |
| Primary splits | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 44 | 1168 | 10.1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 46.2% | 39.5% | 89.9% | 61.7% | 57.4% | 1.2 |
| Away | 43 | 1132 | 8.9 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 41.3% | 35.8% | 90.3% | 55.3% | 51.2% | 1.1 |
| Wins | 57 | 1478 | 9.6 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 43.9% | 36.9% | 93.0% | 58.4% | 54.3% | 1.2 |
How did performance evolve during the season?
| By month | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-10 | 1 | 28 | 19.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 53.8% | 44.4% | 100.0% | 70.7% | 69.2% | 0.0 |
| 2013-11 | 11 | 280 | 9.6 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 44.7% | 37.5% | 83.3% | 57.0% | 53.5% | 1.3 |
| 2013-12 | 13 | 331 | 10.8 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 51.0% | 37.3% | 90.9% | 64.3% | 60.5% | 1.7 |
PTS per game vs season average · sorted best → worst · G shown
| Opponent | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IND | 9 | 240 | 8.7 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 38.3% | 42.9% | 94.4% | 57.4% | 50.8% | 1.0 |
| BKN | 9 | 258 | 10.3 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 40.6% | 30.8% | 89.3% | 57.2% | 49.3% | 0.6 |
| SA | 7 | 201 | 9.3 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 43.1% | 42.9% | 90.0% | 58.7% | 54.9% |
Conservation: Home+Away, Wins+Losses, and Starter+Bench each equal the season game universe when those fields are complete.
| Losses |
| 30 |
| 822 |
| 9.3 |
| 2.8 |
| 1.7 |
| 43.5% |
| 39.2% |
| 85.5% |
| 58.8% |
| 54.4% |
| 1.0 |
| 2014-01 |
| 13 |
| 373 |
| 6.7 |
| 3.5 |
| 2.0 |
| 31.8% |
| 23.9% |
| 88.0% |
| 45.3% |
| 38.2% |
| 1.1 |
| 2014-02 | 9 | 217 | 7.7 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 41.4% | 38.2% | 100.0% | 56.1% | 52.6% | 1.2 |
| 2014-03 | 12 | 342 | 12.5 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 48.6% | 42.6% | 95.2% | 64.5% | 60.7% | 0.7 |
| 2014-04 | 12 | 282 | 7.0 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 39.7% | 38.8% | 77.8% | 54.6% | 52.7% | 1.1 |
| 2014-05 | 11 | 293 | 11.2 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 44.6% | 40.4% | 93.3% | 63.9% | 57.2% | 0.9 |
| 2014-06 | 5 | 154 | 9.8 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 41.5% | 40.9% | 85.7% | 55.6% | 52.4% | 1.6 |
| 1.6 |
| CHA | 7 | 167 | 5.1 | 3.3 | 1.9 | 34.1% | 31.8% | 100.0% | 43.4% | 42.7% | 1.3 |
| WSH | 4 | 104 | 7.5 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 42.3% | 35.3% | 100.0% | 55.8% | 53.8% | 0.5 |
| ATL | 4 | 119 | 13.3 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 66.7% | 56.3% | 80.0% | 84.4% | 83.3% | 1.5 |
| NY | 4 | 90 | 8.0 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 41.7% | 38.9% | 100.0% | 61.1% | 56.3% | 1.0 |
| ORL | 4 | 88 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 25.0% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 37.5% | 33.3% | 1.3 |
| PHI | 3 | 75 | 10.7 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 41.4% | 27.8% | 60.0% | 51.3% | 50.0% | 1.7 |
| BOS | 3 | 89 | 8.7 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 45.5% | 22.2% | 80.0% | 53.7% | 50.0% | 0.7 |
| CLE | 3 | 75 | 11.0 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 40.7% | 29.4% | 100.0% | 55.7% | 50.0% | 2.0 |
| DET | 3 | 79 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 50.0% | 53.8% | 100.0% | 65.5% | 62.5% | 1.7 |
| TOR | 3 | 79 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 34.6% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 47.9% | 42.3% | 2.0 |
| MEM | 2 | 56 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 50.0% | 44.4% | 100.0% | 63.6% | 61.1% | 0.5 |
| MIN | 2 | 49 | 10.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 44.4% | 22.2% | 100.0% | 54.3% | 50.0% | 1.5 |
| POR | 2 | 58 | 8.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 33.3% | 30.0% | — | 40.5% | 40.5% | 0.5 |
| HOU | 2 | 55 | 19.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 63.2% | 54.5% | 100.0% | 84.4% | 78.9% | 0.0 |
| DEN | 2 | 60 | 17.5 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 68.8% | 63.6% | 85.7% | 91.7% | 90.6% | 1.0 |
| OKC | 2 | 56 | 5.5 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 30.0% | 20.0% | 80.0% | 45.1% | 35.0% | 1.5 |
| GS | 2 | 51 | 7.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 36.4% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 56.8% | 50.0% | 0.0 |
| PHX | 2 | 54 | 12.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 52.9% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 67.1% | 64.7% | 2.0 |
| UTAH | 2 | 47 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 42.9% | 25.0% | — | 50.0% | 50.0% | 2.0 |
| LAC | 2 | 53 | 13.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 56.3% | 25.0% | 87.5% | 69.2% | 62.5% | 1.0 |
| LAL | 2 | 49 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 61.5% | 60.0% | 0.0% | 81.8% | 84.6% | 0.5 |
| DAL | 1 | 22 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| SAC | 1 | 26 | 18.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 61.5% | 33.3% | — | 69.2% | 69.2% | 4.0 |
