| 61.5% |
| 2009-10 | 16.3 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 60.1% |
Under which conditions does this player change? Rates from Σ/Σ.
Difference vs season baseline (per game / rate). Sample size shown.
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | TS% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 44 | 1606 | +0.5 | -0.1 | +0.2 | +1.9pp | +0.3pp | +2.4pp | -0.1 |
| Away | 45 | 1645 | -0.5 | +0.1 | -0.2 | -1.8pp | -0.3pp | -2.3pp | +0.1 |
| Wins | 60 | 2180 | +1.1 | -0.2 | +0.0 | +2.5pp | +3.1pp | +2.9pp | -0.1 |
| Losses | 29 | 1071 | -2.2 | +0.4 | -0.1 | -5.5pp | -6.7pp | -6.3pp | +0.2 |
| Primary splits | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 44 | 1606 | 17.2 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 51.3% | 46.4% | 87.2% | 64.8% | 61.0% | 1.3 |
| Away | 45 | 1645 | 16.3 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 47.6% | 45.8% | 91.0% | 60.1% | 56.3% | 1.5 |
| Wins | 60 | 2180 | 17.8 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 51.9% | 49.2% | 89.2% | 65.3% | 61.7% | 1.4 |
How did performance evolve during the season?
| By month | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-10 | 3 | 114 | 14.7 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 40.5% | 33.3% | 88.9% | 53.7% | 48.6% | 1.7 |
| 2010-11 | 13 | 494 | 17.2 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 49.1% | 48.5% | 89.3% | 61.5% | 58.6% | 1.6 |
| 2010-12 | 15 | 532 | 16.9 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 49.7% | 37.1% | 88.2% | 60.6% | 55.9% | 1.7 |
PTS per game vs season average · sorted best → worst · G shown
| Opponent | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 9 | 362 | 18.1 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 48.2% | 53.4% | 95.7% | 65.7% | 61.8% | 1.1 |
| NY | 7 | 278 | 20.1 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 50.0% | 55.0% | 100.0% | 65.1% | 61.0% | 1.3 |
| CHI | 4 | 154 | 16.3 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 50.0% | 40.0% | 100.0% | 61.5% | 56.3% |
Conservation: Home+Away, Wins+Losses, and Starter+Bench each equal the season game universe when those fields are complete.
| Losses |
| 29 |
| 1071 |
| 14.6 |
| 3.8 |
| 2.6 |
| 43.9% |
| 39.4% |
| 88.3% |
| 56.1% |
| 51.8% |
| 1.6 |
| 2011-01 |
| 16 |
| 545 |
| 17.9 |
| 3.6 |
| 2.5 |
| 54.5% |
| 51.8% |
| 80.0% |
| 68.1% |
| 65.7% |
| 1.4 |
| 2011-02 | 10 | 374 | 17.7 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 47.6% | 43.8% | 90.9% | 58.0% | 54.9% | 1.2 |
| 2011-03 | 16 | 573 | 15.8 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 46.8% | 45.5% | 95.5% | 61.0% | 56.1% | 1.0 |
| 2011-04 | 11 | 418 | 15.5 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 51.3% | 50.0% | 89.7% | 65.9% | 62.0% | 1.8 |
| 2011-05 | 5 | 201 | 16.4 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 47.3% | 50.0% | 93.8% | 66.1% | 60.9% | 1.0 |
| 1.3 |
| PHI | 4 | 147 | 15.8 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 48.9% | 41.7% | 82.4% | 60.0% | 54.4% | 1.5 |
| DET | 4 | 139 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 47.2% | 25.0% | 83.3% | 58.1% | 52.8% | 2.8 |
| IND | 4 | 139 | 14.3 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 51.1% | 35.3% | 71.4% | 59.3% | 57.8% | 1.8 |
| CHA | 4 | 147 | 18.5 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 45.5% | 52.6% | 96.0% | 67.3% | 56.8% | 2.8 |
| NJ | 4 | 137 | 14.8 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 54.5% | 42.9% | 71.4% | 62.7% | 61.4% | 1.3 |
| TOR | 4 | 149 | 19.0 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 53.8% | 55.0% | 81.8% | 66.9% | 64.4% | 1.5 |
| WSH | 3 | 101 | 13.3 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 48.5% | 23.5% | 66.7% | 56.1% | 54.5% | 1.7 |
| ATL | 3 | 102 | 12.7 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 50.0% | 45.5% | 100.0% | 60.7% | 58.3% | 1.3 |
| MIL | 3 | 114 | 17.7 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 47.6% | 53.8% | 85.7% | 58.8% | 56.0% | 1.0 |
| ORL | 3 | 117 | 15.3 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 45.5% | 46.2% | 83.3% | 60.1% | 54.5% | 0.7 |
| CLE | 3 | 83 | 14.0 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 41.7% | 28.6% | 72.7% | 51.4% | 47.2% | 0.7 |
| SA | 2 | 80 | 22.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.3% | 37.5% | 81.8% | 69.1% | 64.8% | 2.5 |
| MIN | 2 | 69 | 15.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 46.2% | 55.6% | 100.0% | 57.7% | 55.8% | 0.0 |
| MEM | 2 | 77 | 14.5 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 42.9% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 62.5% | 57.1% | 0.5 |
| NO | 2 | 84 | 19.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 53.8% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 66.3% | 61.5% | 2.0 |
| HOU | 2 | 59 | 13.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 57.9% | 66.7% | 100.0% | 66.4% | 63.2% | 1.0 |
| LAC | 2 | 76 | 22.5 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 51.6% | 44.4% | 100.0% | 64.4% | 58.1% | 1.5 |
| GS | 2 | 75 | 22.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 58.6% | 53.8% | 80.0% | 72.1% | 70.7% | 1.0 |
| PHX | 2 | 67 | 13.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 45.5% | 60.0% | 33.3% | 57.9% | 59.1% | 2.5 |
| UTAH | 2 | 67 | 18.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 50.0% | 43.8% | 100.0% | 68.7% | 64.6% | 1.5 |
| DEN | 2 | 71 | 19.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 52.0% | 40.0% | 88.9% | 65.6% | 60.0% | 3.0 |
| LAL | 2 | 70 | 20.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 53.3% | 40.0% | 100.0% | 65.5% | 63.3% | 0.5 |
| DAL | 2 | 74 | 17.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 44.8% | 44.4% | 100.0% | 56.1% | 51.7% | 1.0 |
| SAC | 2 | 62 | 18.0 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 56.0% | 66.7% | — | 72.0% | 72.0% | 0.5 |
| POR | 2 | 76 | 13.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 34.6% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 47.9% | 42.3% | 1.5 |
| OKC | 2 | 75 | 13.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 44.0% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 52.2% | 50.0% | 1.5 |
