| 61.5% |
| 2009-10 | 16.3 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 60.1% |
Under which conditions does this player change? Rates from Σ/Σ.
Difference vs season baseline (per game / rate). Sample size shown.
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | TS% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 52 | 1811 | -0.6 | +0.1 | -0.1 | +0.6pp | -2.2pp | -0.2pp | -0.3 |
| Away | 52 | 1928 | +0.6 | -0.1 | +0.1 | -0.6pp | +2.1pp | +0.2pp | +0.3 |
| Wins | 65 | 2330 | +1.2 | +0.0 | +0.1 | +2.2pp | +3.5pp | +2.9pp | -0.1 |
| Losses | 39 | 1409 | -2.1 | -0.0 | -0.1 | -4.0pp | -6.1pp | -5.3pp | +0.2 |
| Primary splits | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 52 | 1811 | 15.6 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 47.2% | 34.7% | 92.4% | 59.2% | 54.5% | 1.3 |
| Away | 52 | 1928 | 16.9 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 46.0% | 39.0% | 88.4% | 59.6% | 54.4% | 1.9 |
| Wins | 65 | 2330 | 17.5 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 48.8% | 40.5% | 91.0% | 62.3% | 57.4% | 1.5 |
How did performance evolve during the season?
| By month | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | 3 | 103 | 18.0 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 42.9% | 47.1% | 83.3% | 57.1% | 52.4% | 2.3 |
| 2009-11 | 14 | 497 | 14.6 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 47.3% | 25.0% | 96.9% | 56.0% | 51.5% | 1.6 |
| 2009-12 | 14 | 519 | 17.3 | 4.2 | 2.8 | 44.5% | 39.5% | 89.3% | 58.6% | 52.7% | 1.7 |
PTS per game vs season average · sorted best → worst · G shown
| Opponent | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORL | 10 | 401 | 16.1 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 44.9% | 41.2% | 85.0% | 59.4% | 53.8% | 1.8 |
| CLE | 10 | 385 | 18.4 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 45.0% | 42.9% | 91.2% | 59.4% | 54.6% | 1.4 |
| LAL | 9 | 345 | 14.8 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 39.1% | 30.2% | 93.1% | 52.1% | 46.1% |
Conservation: Home+Away, Wins+Losses, and Starter+Bench each equal the season game universe when those fields are complete.
| Losses |
| 39 |
| 1409 |
| 14.2 |
| 3.2 |
| 2.5 |
| 42.6% |
| 30.8% |
| 88.3% |
| 54.1% |
| 49.2% |
| 1.7 |
| 2010-01 |
| 14 |
| 525 |
| 14.6 |
| 3.2 |
| 2.4 |
| 43.7% |
| 31.9% |
| 83.7% |
| 54.9% |
| 50.3% |
| 1.8 |
| 2010-02 | 11 | 411 | 20.0 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 50.6% | 35.4% | 91.1% | 63.3% | 58.1% | 1.8 |
| 2010-03 | 17 | 530 | 14.7 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 50.0% | 39.0% | 97.1% | 62.7% | 58.7% | 1.1 |
| 2010-04 | 12 | 405 | 18.8 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 54.3% | 50.0% | 87.2% | 71.2% | 67.0% | 1.8 |
| 2010-05 | 12 | 474 | 15.7 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 43.0% | 36.8% | 86.8% | 56.0% | 51.3% | 1.3 |
| 2010-06 | 7 | 275 | 14.6 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 36.7% | 29.3% | 96.0% | 50.5% | 43.3% | 1.7 |
| 1.6 |
| MIA | 8 | 297 | 19.1 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 50.5% | 46.2% | 81.8% | 66.2% | 62.4% | 2.1 |
| CHI | 4 | 125 | 15.8 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 53.5% | 44.4% | 90.0% | 66.5% | 62.8% | 2.0 |
| WSH | 4 | 146 | 17.5 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 50.0% | 40.0% | 100.0% | 64.3% | 60.0% | 1.5 |
| TOR | 4 | 143 | 19.3 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 51.8% | 35.3% | 81.3% | 61.1% | 57.1% | 1.5 |
| NY | 4 | 136 | 15.8 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 50.0% | 31.8% | 93.3% | 64.8% | 58.3% | 2.3 |
| PHI | 4 | 135 | 14.0 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 41.5% | 27.8% | 100.0% | 49.9% | 46.2% | 1.5 |
| NJ | 4 | 132 | 15.8 | 4.8 | 3.0 | 45.8% | 27.8% | 100.0% | 58.2% | 51.0% | 2.0 |
| ATL | 4 | 160 | 12.5 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 40.4% | 38.9% | 83.3% | 50.4% | 47.9% | 1.5 |
| MIL | 3 | 103 | 12.3 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 47.4% | 28.6% | 100.0% | 69.9% | 52.6% | 0.7 |
| DET | 3 | 95 | 13.7 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 50.0% | 30.8% | 100.0% | 62.0% | 56.7% | 2.3 |
| IND | 3 | 104 | 20.0 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 48.7% | 37.5% | 94.1% | 64.5% | 56.4% | 1.3 |
| CHA | 3 | 92 | 16.0 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 46.4% | 58.8% | 92.3% | 71.2% | 64.3% | 1.0 |
| HOU | 2 | 52 | 12.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 64.3% | 62.5% | 100.0% | 83.1% | 82.1% | 1.5 |
| OKC | 2 | 66 | 12.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 43.5% | 11.1% | 75.0% | 48.5% | 45.7% | 1.5 |
| SA | 2 | 67 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 41.3% | 33.3% | 1.5 |
| SAC | 2 | 71 | 17.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 39.4% | 30.8% | 100.0% | 49.7% | 45.5% | 1.5 |
| DEN | 2 | 78 | 20.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 55.6% | 30.0% | 100.0% | 67.2% | 61.1% | 1.5 |
| UTAH | 2 | 62 | 15.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 50.0% | 27.3% | 100.0% | 65.0% | 57.5% | 2.5 |
| DAL | 2 | 77 | 21.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 57.1% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 70.6% | 67.9% | 1.0 |
| MEM | 2 | 63 | 17.5 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 48.1% | 41.7% | 80.0% | 59.9% | 57.4% | 0.5 |
| POR | 2 | 82 | 15.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 42.9% | 33.3% | 50.0% | 50.4% | 50.0% | 1.0 |
| LAC | 2 | 78 | 14.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 42.3% | 30.0% | 75.0% | 50.4% | 48.1% | 2.0 |
| PHX | 2 | 66 | 15.5 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 45.8% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 58.2% | 52.1% | 1.5 |
| GS | 2 | 74 | 19.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 51.6% | 11.1% | 75.0% | 56.5% | 53.2% | 2.0 |
| MIN | 2 | 63 | 17.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 50.0% | 30.8% | 66.7% | 58.0% | 57.1% | 0.5 |
| NO | 1 | 41 | 17.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 53.3% | 33.3% | — | 56.7% | 56.7% | 0.0 |
