| 61.5% |
| 2009-10 | 16.3 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 60.1% |
Under which conditions does this player change? Rates from Σ/Σ.
Difference vs season baseline (per game / rate). Sample size shown.
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | TS% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 27 | 1054 | +2.1 | -0.1 | +0.3 | +1.8pp | +5.5pp | +2.5pp | -0.2 |
| Away | 29 | 1098 | -2.0 | +0.1 | -0.2 | -1.8pp | -5.5pp | -2.6pp | +0.2 |
| Wins | 25 | 956 | +1.3 | -0.2 | +0.7 | +5.0pp | +4.8pp | +5.5pp | -0.4 |
| Losses | 31 | 1196 | -1.0 | +0.2 | -0.6 | -3.8pp | -3.8pp | -4.1pp | +0.3 |
| Primary splits | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 27 | 1054 | 25.1 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 45.7% | 44.7% | 90.6% | 59.1% | 53.9% | 2.6 |
| Away | 29 | 1098 | 21.0 | 5.2 | 4.6 | 42.2% | 33.7% | 90.2% | 54.1% | 48.5% | 3.0 |
| Wins | 25 | 956 | 24.2 | 4.9 | 5.5 | 49.0% | 44.0% | 91.3% | 62.1% | 57.3% | 2.4 |
How did performance evolve during the season?
| By month | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-12 | 4 | 126 | 22.3 | 5.8 | 4.3 | 41.3% | 33.3% | 81.0% | 52.8% | 48.0% | 2.8 |
| 2004-01 | 15 | 568 | 23.8 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 44.8% | 38.8% | 88.1% | 56.5% | 52.6% | 2.7 |
| 2004-02 | 15 | 597 | 22.1 | 5.7 | 5.1 | 40.3% | 39.8% | 93.8% | 54.7% | 47.9% | 2.9 |
PTS per game vs season average · sorted best → worst · G shown
| Opponent | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAL | 4 | 151 | 20.5 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 42.6% | 40.7% | 81.3% | 54.6% | 50.7% | 2.5 |
| LAL | 4 | 160 | 25.5 | 5.3 | 8.0 | 49.3% | 41.9% | 94.4% | 63.0% | 58.2% | 3.8 |
| GS | 4 | 150 | 16.0 | 6.5 | 4.8 | 32.9% | 34.8% | 90.9% | 42.8% | 38.6% |
Conservation: Home+Away, Wins+Losses, and Starter+Bench each equal the season game universe when those fields are complete.
| Losses |
| 31 |
| 1196 |
| 22.0 |
| 5.3 |
| 4.2 |
| 40.2% |
| 35.4% |
| 89.7% |
| 52.5% |
| 46.6% |
| 3.1 |
| 2004-03 |
| 14 |
| 561 |
| 24.3 |
| 5.3 |
| 3.4 |
| 46.2% |
| 38.6% |
| 90.1% |
| 57.6% |
| 52.3% |
| 2.6 |
| 2004-04 | 8 | 300 | 21.1 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 46.7% | 43.5% | 92.5% | 61.4% | 55.0% | 3.0 |
| 2.0 |
| SAC | 4 | 136 | 18.3 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 36.8% | 25.8% | 88.2% | 48.4% | 42.6% | 2.5 |
| HOU | 3 | 122 | 21.0 | 6.0 | 4.3 | 42.9% | 40.0% | 86.7% | 56.7% | 51.0% | 2.3 |
| SA | 3 | 117 | 20.0 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 41.8% | 30.8% | 100.0% | 50.5% | 45.5% | 3.0 |
| MIN | 3 | 118 | 21.7 | 6.3 | 5.3 | 36.1% | 18.8% | 90.0% | 46.6% | 38.5% | 2.3 |
| POR | 3 | 129 | 32.0 | 6.3 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 48.1% | 90.0% | 70.2% | 68.0% | 4.0 |
| UTAH | 3 | 116 | 30.7 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 54.7% | 52.6% | 92.3% | 71.4% | 64.2% | 3.7 |
| MEM | 3 | 112 | 18.7 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 42.3% | 25.0% | 90.0% | 49.6% | 45.2% | 4.3 |
| PHX | 3 | 104 | 21.7 | 6.3 | 6.7 | 40.0% | 47.6% | 88.2% | 56.5% | 50.0% | 1.7 |
| LAC | 2 | 76 | 33.5 | 2.5 | 8.0 | 59.5% | 50.0% | 93.3% | 76.8% | 71.6% | 2.0 |
| NO | 2 | 76 | 22.0 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 50.0% | 54.5% | 100.0% | 67.9% | 60.7% | 4.5 |
| DEN | 2 | 81 | 25.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 43.2% | 38.5% | 80.0% | 52.7% | 48.9% | 4.0 |
| ORL | 2 | 78 | 24.0 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 45.0% | 38.5% | 100.0% | 55.7% | 51.2% | 1.0 |
| PHI | 2 | 83 | 29.5 | 9.0 | 3.5 | 38.8% | 31.3% | 88.9% | 51.8% | 43.9% | 3.5 |
| CLE | 2 | 81 | 22.5 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 40.0% | 38.9% | 100.0% | 49.0% | 47.8% | 2.0 |
| ATL | 1 | 41 | 27.0 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 46.7% | 33.3% | 91.7% | 66.6% | 53.3% | 0.0 |
| MIA | 1 | 32 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 29.4% | 28.6% | 80.0% | 41.7% | 35.3% | 2.0 |
| BOS | 1 | 42 | 20.0 | 7.0 | 10.0 | 41.2% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 57.3% | 55.9% | 1.0 |
| TOR | 1 | 39 | 23.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 87.5% | 65.6% | 57.1% | 5.0 |
| CHI | 1 | 41 | 27.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 68.8% | 66.7% | 100.0% | 82.1% | 81.3% | 1.0 |
| WSH | 1 | 42 | 19.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 30.0% | 22.2% | 100.0% | 42.8% | 35.0% | 4.0 |
| NY | 1 | 25 | 23.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 58.3% | 42.9% | 85.7% | 76.3% | 70.8% | 2.0 |
