| 61.7% |
| 2009-10 | 19.5 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 60.1% |
Under which conditions does this player change? Rates from Σ/Σ.
Difference vs season baseline (per game / rate). Sample size shown.
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | TS% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 11 | 334 | -0.5 | -0.0 | +0.5 | -1.0pp | -0.2pp | -1.6pp | -0.1 |
| Away | 9 | 273 | +0.6 | +0.1 | -0.6 | +1.2pp | +0.2pp | +1.9pp | +0.1 |
| Wins | 14 | 441 | +0.9 | +0.4 | +0.4 | +1.7pp | +2.2pp | +1.8pp | -0.1 |
| Losses | 6 | 166 | -2.1 | -1.0 | -0.8 | -4.7pp | -7.4pp | -4.6pp | +0.3 |
| Primary splits | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 11 | 334 | 14.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 35.4% | 38.2% | 91.5% | 53.8% | 45.7% | 1.8 |
| Away | 9 | 273 | 15.6 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 37.6% | 38.6% | 87.5% | 57.3% | 48.5% | 2.0 |
| Wins | 14 | 441 | 15.9 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 38.1% | 40.6% | 93.2% | 57.2% | 49.7% | 1.8 |
How did performance evolve during the season?
| By month | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | 2 | 66 | 16.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 33.3% | 35.7% | 100.0% | 55.5% | 43.8% | 1.0 |
| 2012-01 | 14 | 435 | 15.8 | 2.5 | 4.4 | 36.8% | 37.6% | 87.5% | 54.5% | 46.2% | 2.2 |
| 2012-02 | 4 | 106 | 11.5 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 36.4% | 42.3% | 91.7% | 60.1% | 53.0% | 1.3 |
PTS per game vs season average · sorted best → worst · G shown
| Opponent | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEN | 2 | 57 | 20.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 44.8% | 42.1% | 100.0% | 63.2% | 58.6% | 1.5 |
| UTAH | 2 | 58 | 9.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 20.0% | 0.0% | 76.9% | 35.0% | 20.0% | 3.0 |
| LAL | 2 | 66 | 14.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 35.0% | 50.0% | 76.9% | 54.4% | 45.0% |
Conservation: Home+Away, Wins+Losses, and Starter+Bench each equal the season game universe when those fields are complete.
| Losses |
| 6 |
| 166 |
| 12.8 |
| 1.5 |
| 3.2 |
| 31.7% |
| 31.0% |
| 83.3% |
| 50.8% |
| 39.2% |
| 2.2 |
| 1.0 |
| ORL | 1 | 32 | 18.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 45.5% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 73.1% | 68.2% | 0.0 |
| WSH | 1 | 18 | 12.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 80.0% | 100.0% | — | 120.0% | 120.0% | 2.0 |
| OKC | 1 | 36 | 13.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 44.4% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 63.0% | 55.6% | 0.0 |
| MEM | 1 | 23 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 40.0% | 25.0% | — | 45.0% | 45.0% | 4.0 |
| TOR | 1 | 31 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 14.0 | 11.1% | 14.3% | 100.0% | 25.3% | 16.7% | 2.0 |
| MIN | 1 | 28 | 20.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 46.2% | 50.0% | 83.3% | 63.9% | 57.7% | 4.0 |
| DAL | 1 | 32 | 21.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 36.8% | 45.5% | 66.7% | 51.7% | 50.0% | 3.0 |
| NJ | 1 | 34 | 20.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 31.3% | 60.0% | 100.0% | 52.4% | 40.6% | 1.0 |
| MIA | 1 | 40 | 12.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 18.2% | 25.0% | 85.7% | 42.6% | 27.3% | 4.0 |
| POR | 1 | 31 | 19.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 38.5% | 33.3% | 87.5% | 57.5% | 46.2% | 5.0 |
| MIL | 1 | 32 | 19.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 35.7% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 55.6% | 42.9% | 0.0 |
| HOU | 1 | 23 | 13.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 60.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 85.1% | 70.0% | 0.0 |
| SA | 1 | 28 | 11.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 40.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 76.4% | 60.0% | 1.0 |
| GS | 1 | 38 | 21.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 31.6% | 30.0% | 100.0% | 48.5% | 39.5% | 1.0 |
