Loading percentile ranking…
Loading percentile ranking…
Loading deep stats…
Loading deep stats…
| 51.6% |
| 2009-10 | 18.7 | 1.3 | 8.4 | 52.9% |
Under which conditions does this player change? Rates from Σ/Σ.
Difference vs season baseline (per game / rate). Sample size shown.
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | TS% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 13 | 80 | -0.4 | -0.3 | +0.0 | +10.7pp | 0.0pp | +12.0pp | -0.2 |
| Away | 19 | 186 | +0.3 | +0.2 | -0.0 | -3.9pp | — | -4.8pp | +0.1 |
| Wins | 14 | 124 | +0.3 | +0.2 | -0.1 | +3.6pp | 0.0pp | +3.5pp | -0.2 |
| Losses | 18 | 142 | -0.2 | -0.2 | +0.0 | -3.0pp | — | -2.9pp | +0.2 |
| Primary splits | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 13 | 80 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 60.0% | 50.0% | 72.7% | 66.4% | 62.5% | 0.1 |
| Away | 19 | 186 | 3.3 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 45.5% | — | 70.6% | 49.6% | 45.5% | 0.4 |
| Wins | 14 | 124 | 3.3 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 52.9% | 50.0% | 69.2% | 57.9% | 54.4% | 0.1 |
How did performance evolve during the season?
| By month | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-11 | 11 | 56 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 50.0% | — | 83.3% | 56.3% | 50.0% | 0.1 |
| 2003-12 | 7 | 92 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 39.3% | — | 50.0% | 41.2% | 39.3% | 0.3 |
| 2004-01 | 2 | 17 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 100.0% | — | 75.0% | 90.6% | 100.0% | 0.5 |
PTS per game vs season average · sorted best → worst · G shown
| Opponent | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 3 | 13 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 50.0% | — | — | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.3 |
| ATL | 3 | 51 | 4.7 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 54.5% | — | 50.0% | 54.9% | 54.5% | 0.7 |
| DEN | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — |
Conservation: Home+Away, Wins+Losses, and Starter+Bench each equal the season game universe when those fields are complete.
| Losses |
| 18 |
| 142 |
| 2.7 |
| 1.5 |
| 0.2 |
| 46.3% |
| — |
| 73.3% |
| 51.5% |
| 46.3% |
| 0.4 |
| 2004-02 |
| 5 |
| 54 |
| 4.4 |
| 2.0 |
| 0.2 |
| 52.9% |
| 50.0% |
| 75.0% |
| 58.6% |
| 55.9% |
| 0.6 |
| 2004-03 | 4 | 34 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 62.5% | — | 83.3% | 70.5% | 62.5% | 0.3 |
| 2004-04 | 3 | 13 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 60.0% | — | — | 60.0% | 60.0% | 0.3 |
| 0.0 |
| MIA | 2 | 18 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 60.0% | 0.0% | 71.4% | 68.1% | 60.0% | 0.5 |
| ORL | 2 | 36 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 58.3% | 100.0% | — | 62.5% | 62.5% | 0.0 |
| WSH | 2 | 5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 25.0% | — | — | 25.0% | 25.0% | 0.0 |
| TOR | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| NJ | 2 | 34 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 25.0% | — | 75.0% | 43.4% | 25.0% | 0.5 |
| CHI | 2 | 13 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 60.0% | — | — | 60.0% | 60.0% | 0.5 |
| BOS | 2 | 13 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 25.0% | — | 100.0% | 41.0% | 25.0% | 0.5 |
| NY | 2 | 15 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | — | 100.0% | 54.3% | 50.0% | 0.0 |
| CLE | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0 |
| IND | 1 | 8 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | — | — | 50.0% | 50.0% | 1.0 |
| PHX | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% | — | 100.0% | 105.4% | 100.0% | 0.0 |
| LAC | 1 | 20 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 80.0% | — | 50.0% | 76.5% | 80.0% | 1.0 |
| POR | 1 | 10 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | — | — | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.0 |
| NO | 1 | 11 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 16.7% | — | 50.0% | 21.8% | 16.7% | 0.0 |
| SEA | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| LAL | 1 | 2 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% | — | 66.7% | 86.2% | 100.0% | 0.0 |