Loading percentile ranking…
Loading percentile ranking…
Loading deep stats…
Loading deep stats…
| 51.6% |
| 2009-10 | 18.7 | 1.3 | 8.4 | 52.9% |
Under which conditions does this player change? Rates from Σ/Σ.
Difference vs season baseline (per game / rate). Sample size shown.
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | TS% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 41 | 1536 | +0.7 | +0.6 | +0.1 | +0.1pp | +2.2pp | +0.9pp | +0.2 |
| Away | 41 | 1497 | -0.7 | -0.6 | -0.1 | -0.1pp | -2.4pp | -0.9pp | -0.2 |
| Wins | 21 | 766 | +2.6 | +0.5 | +0.5 | +3.5pp | +5.9pp | +4.5pp | +0.1 |
| Losses | 61 | 2267 | -0.9 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -1.2pp | -1.7pp | -1.6pp | -0.0 |
| Primary splits | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 41 | 1536 | 20.4 | 7.3 | 2.0 | 44.8% | 34.5% | 73.8% | 52.5% | 47.5% | 2.1 |
| Away | 41 | 1497 | 19.1 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 44.5% | 30.0% | 72.9% | 50.7% | 46.7% | 1.8 |
| Wins | 21 | 766 | 22.4 | 7.2 | 2.5 | 48.2% | 38.3% | 77.9% | 56.1% | 50.7% | 2.1 |
How did performance evolve during the season?
| By month | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-11 | 16 | 570 | 17.7 | 5.9 | 2.5 | 42.7% | 44.0% | 73.0% | 49.2% | 44.9% | 2.2 |
| 2001-12 | 14 | 499 | 17.6 | 6.6 | 1.8 | 41.3% | 31.3% | 73.2% | 48.4% | 43.5% | 1.6 |
| 2002-01 | 13 | 497 | 22.0 | 7.2 | 1.8 | 47.4% | 20.0% | 75.9% | 53.2% | 48.3% | 2.2 |
PTS per game vs season average · sorted best → worst · G shown
| Opponent | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAC | 4 | 172 | 27.8 | 12.8 | 2.5 | 47.2% | 30.8% | 74.2% | 54.1% | 49.4% | 2.3 |
| SAC | 4 | 152 | 19.3 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 51.6% | 33.3% | 64.3% | 56.5% | 54.8% | 2.3 |
| UTAH | 4 | 154 | 22.8 | 6.8 | 2.0 | 49.3% | 35.7% | 72.0% | 56.9% | 52.9% |
Conservation: Home+Away, Wins+Losses, and Starter+Bench each equal the season game universe when those fields are complete.
| Losses |
| 61 |
| 2267 |
| 18.8 |
| 6.6 |
| 1.8 |
| 43.4% |
| 30.7% |
| 71.4% |
| 50.0% |
| 45.9% |
| 1.9 |
| 2002-02 |
| 12 |
| 452 |
| 20.6 |
| 7.8 |
| 1.3 |
| 40.6% |
| 31.7% |
| 81.5% |
| 50.9% |
| 43.7% |
| 1.8 |
| 2002-03 | 18 | 679 | 20.2 | 7.2 | 2.2 | 45.6% | 30.4% | 66.0% | 51.7% | 48.4% | 1.6 |
| 2002-04 | 9 | 336 | 21.6 | 5.8 | 2.0 | 52.3% | 36.1% | 71.4% | 59.0% | 56.7% | 2.8 |
| 2.3 |
| DEN | 4 | 150 | 23.3 | 7.8 | 1.8 | 51.6% | 30.0% | 81.3% | 61.1% | 54.0% | 2.8 |
| MIN | 4 | 146 | 21.0 | 6.3 | 1.8 | 54.7% | 38.5% | 81.8% | 61.0% | 58.6% | 2.0 |
| POR | 4 | 145 | 21.5 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 53.0% | 62.5% | 84.6% | 60.0% | 56.8% | 1.8 |
| MEM | 4 | 134 | 17.5 | 6.3 | 2.0 | 52.5% | 18.2% | 50.0% | 54.2% | 54.1% | 2.3 |
| HOU | 4 | 161 | 16.8 | 6.5 | 1.8 | 35.1% | 10.0% | 82.4% | 41.1% | 35.8% | 0.8 |
| SEA | 4 | 150 | 12.8 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 33.9% | 11.1% | 83.3% | 39.7% | 34.7% | 2.5 |
| DAL | 4 | 146 | 16.3 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 38.5% | 40.0% | 68.8% | 45.1% | 41.5% | 1.0 |
| LAL | 4 | 157 | 18.8 | 8.0 | 2.3 | 41.5% | 10.0% | 69.0% | 48.2% | 42.3% | 1.8 |
| SA | 4 | 142 | 20.8 | 6.5 | 0.8 | 44.6% | 36.4% | 92.9% | 51.8% | 47.3% | 1.8 |
| PHX | 4 | 148 | 21.8 | 7.8 | 1.3 | 47.8% | 50.0% | 69.0% | 54.5% | 50.0% | 1.5 |
| DET | 2 | 66 | 17.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 37.9% | 25.0% | 70.6% | 48.0% | 39.7% | 1.5 |
| BOS | 2 | 70 | 20.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 38.1% | 57.1% | 50.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% | 1.5 |
| WSH | 2 | 74 | 21.0 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 46.9% | 16.7% | 73.3% | 54.4% | 48.4% | 4.0 |
| IND | 2 | 85 | 23.5 | 8.5 | 1.0 | 45.9% | 42.9% | 71.4% | 54.4% | 50.0% | 1.5 |
| ATL | 2 | 82 | 21.5 | 7.5 | 1.0 | 45.5% | 44.4% | 56.3% | 53.7% | 51.5% | 1.5 |
| CHI | 2 | 60 | 11.0 | 7.5 | 1.5 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 38.2% | 33.3% | 1.0 |
| MIL | 2 | 78 | 23.0 | 8.5 | 1.5 | 43.6% | 28.6% | 76.9% | 51.4% | 46.2% | 2.5 |
| PHI | 2 | 75 | 17.5 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 30.3% | 40.0% | 76.5% | 43.2% | 33.3% | 3.5 |
| NJ | 2 | 76 | 23.5 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 41.9% | 42.9% | 88.9% | 50.0% | 45.3% | 1.0 |
| CLE | 2 | 65 | 21.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 48.5% | 25.0% | 69.2% | 54.2% | 50.0% | 1.0 |
| MIA | 2 | 79 | 23.0 | 10.0 | 0.5 | 53.1% | 0.0% | 92.3% | 61.0% | 53.1% | 3.5 |
| ORL | 2 | 69 | 26.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 48.8% | 75.0% | 53.8% | 53.4% | 52.3% | 2.0 |
| CHA | 2 | 72 | 18.5 | 9.5 | 3.5 | 37.0% | 0.0% | 73.9% | 49.8% | 37.0% | 1.5 |
| NY | 2 | 55 | 8.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 28.6% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 35.8% | 31.0% | 2.0 |
| TOR | 2 | 70 | 14.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 40.7% | 100.0% | 54.5% | 45.5% | 42.6% | 3.0 |