Loading percentile ranking…
Loading percentile ranking…
Loading deep stats…
Loading deep stats…
| 51.6% |
| 2009-10 | 18.7 | 1.3 | 8.4 | 52.9% |
Under which conditions does this player change? Rates from Σ/Σ.
Difference vs season baseline (per game / rate). Sample size shown.
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | TS% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 23 | 521 | +1.1 | +1.2 | +0.1 | +1.0pp | +20.0pp | +1.5pp | -0.1 |
| Away | 24 | 537 | -1.1 | -1.2 | -0.1 | -1.2pp | -30.0pp | -1.7pp | +0.1 |
| Wins | 21 | 494 | +0.1 | +0.2 | +0.3 | -1.0pp | +36.7pp | -0.6pp | +0.1 |
| Losses | 26 | 564 | -0.1 | -0.2 | -0.3 | +0.8pp | -15.7pp | +0.5pp | -0.1 |
| Primary splits | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 23 | 521 | 10.7 | 7.7 | 0.8 | 46.2% | 50.0% | 62.7% | 50.2% | 46.9% | 1.3 |
| Away | 24 | 537 | 8.5 | 5.2 | 0.6 | 44.0% | 0.0% | 55.1% | 46.9% | 44.0% | 1.5 |
| Wins | 21 | 494 | 9.6 | 6.6 | 1.0 | 44.2% | 66.7% | 60.6% | 48.1% | 44.8% | 1.6 |
How did performance evolve during the season?
| By month | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999-02 | 13 | 236 | 7.5 | 6.7 | 0.6 | 40.4% | 25.0% | 46.5% | 43.0% | 41.0% | 0.8 |
| 1999-03 | 14 | 300 | 8.6 | 5.2 | 0.4 | 43.0% | 0.0% | 52.8% | 46.0% | 43.0% | 1.5 |
| 1999-04 | 17 | 442 | 10.9 | 6.9 | 1.1 | 47.7% | 50.0% | 74.0% | 52.9% | 48.4% | 1.9 |
PTS per game vs season average · sorted best → worst · G shown
| Opponent | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAL | 4 | 93 | 13.8 | 7.3 | 1.0 | 52.1% | 0.0% | 55.6% | 52.9% | 52.1% | 0.5 |
| UTAH | 4 | 86 | 7.8 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 46.2% | — | 70.0% | 51.0% | 46.2% | 0.8 |
| DEN | 4 | 110 | 11.5 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 47.5% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 52.8% | 47.5% |
Conservation: Home+Away, Wins+Losses, and Starter+Bench each equal the season game universe when those fields are complete.
| Losses |
| 26 |
| 564 |
| 9.5 |
| 6.2 |
| 0.5 |
| 46.0% |
| 14.3% |
| 57.5% |
| 49.1% |
| 46.2% |
| 1.3 |
| 1999-05 |
| 3 |
| 80 |
| 15.7 |
| 7.7 |
| 0.7 |
| 52.5% |
| — |
| 71.4% |
| 54.5% |
| 52.5% |
| 1.3 |
| 2.8 |
| POR | 4 | 78 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 0.8 | 30.0% | — | 28.6% | 30.2% | 30.0% | 0.8 |
| VAN | 3 | 54 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 16.7% | — | 50.0% | 20.2% | 16.7% | 1.3 |
| LAL | 3 | 71 | 6.0 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 45.5% | 100.0% | 41.2% | 48.7% | 50.0% | 2.3 |
| LAC | 3 | 80 | 16.7 | 6.7 | 0.3 | 73.3% | — | 54.5% | 71.8% | 73.3% | 2.0 |
| HOU | 3 | 66 | 12.3 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 51.7% | 0.0% | 58.3% | 54.0% | 51.7% | 2.0 |
| PHX | 3 | 71 | 9.7 | 11.7 | 0.0 | 44.0% | 0.0% | 41.2% | 44.6% | 44.0% | 1.7 |
| SEA | 3 | 58 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 0.3 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 60.0% | 38.2% | 33.3% | 0.7 |
| MIN | 3 | 64 | 9.0 | 6.3 | 0.7 | 45.0% | 100.0% | 61.5% | 52.5% | 47.5% | 2.0 |
| SA | 2 | 60 | 16.5 | 12.5 | 1.0 | 43.8% | — | 83.3% | 47.6% | 43.8% | 1.5 |
| SAC | 2 | 45 | 12.5 | 7.5 | 0.5 | 52.9% | 100.0% | 85.7% | 62.3% | 55.9% | 1.5 |
| WSH | 1 | 31 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 42.9% | — | 100.0% | 59.8% | 42.9% | 0.0 |
| ORL | 1 | 10 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | — | 0.0% | 43.6% | 50.0% | 1.0 |
| CLE | 1 | 19 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% | — | 25.0% | 54.3% | 100.0% | 1.0 |
| IND | 1 | 17 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 40.0% | 0.0% | — | 40.0% | 40.0% | 0.0 |
| MIL | 1 | 23 | 14.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 40.0% | — | 66.7% | 50.1% | 40.0% | 3.0 |
| CHA | 1 | 22 | 8.0 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 25.0% | — | 100.0% | 31.1% | 25.0% | 2.0 |