Mike Conley

6'1"175 lb

Born 1987-10-11 (Age: 25)Pre-NBA: Ohio State

2007Rd 1Pk 4MEM

Per game average

Season	PPG	APG	RPG	TS%
2026-27	-	-	-	-
2025-26	4.5	2.9	1.7	51.7%
2024-25	8.2	4.5	2.6	57.3%
2023-24	11.4	5.9	2.9	62.7%
2022-23	11.9	6.7	2.7	58.3%

Upcoming games

Scores

2026-27 · BOS

Drafted by the Grizzlies with the 4th pick in 2007. How they got him

2012-13 percentile ranking

07-0825-26

Loading percentile ranking…

Overview Sentiment Game Logs Career Splits Shooting Advanced Game Highs

Season stats

Career trend + season grid. Click a season to open that year’s game log.

Season	Tm	G	PTS	AST	TRB	MP	ORB	DRB	TOV	PF
2025-26	MIN	54	4.5	2.9	1.7	18.4	0.3	1.4	0.6	1.6
2024-25	MIN	71	8.2	4.5	2.6	24.7	0.5	2.1	1.1	1.6
2023-24	MIN	76	11.4	5.9	2.9	28.9	0.5	2.4	1.3	1.7
2022-23	UTA/MIN	67	11.9	6.7	2.7	30.3	0.5	2.2	1.5	2.1
2021-22	UTA	72	13.7	5.3	3.0	28.6	0.7	2.4	1.7	2.0
2020-21	UTA	51	16.2	6.0	3.5	29.4	0.7	2.8	1.9	1.9
2019-20	UTA	47	14.4	4.4	3.2	29.0	0.7	2.5	2.0	2.2
2018-19	MEM	70	21.1	6.4	3.4	33.5	0.6	2.8	1.9	1.8
2017-18	MEM	12	17.1	4.1	2.3	31.1	0.0	2.3	1.5	2.0
2016-17	MEM	69	20.5	6.3	3.5	33.2	0.4	3.0	2.3	1.8
2015-16	MEM	56	15.3	6.1	2.9	31.4	0.5	2.5	1.5	1.8
2014-15	MEM	70	15.8	5.4	3.0	31.8	0.4	2.6	2.2	2.0
2013-14	MEM	73	17.2	6.0	2.9	33.5	0.6	2.4	2.1	1.9
2012-13	MEM	80	14.6	6.1	2.8	34.5	0.5	2.3	2.4	2.1
2011-12	MEM	62	12.7	6.5	2.5	35.1	0.4	2.2	2.0	2.1
2010-11	MEM	81	13.7	6.5	3.0	35.5	0.4	2.7	2.2	2.2
2009-10	MEM	80	12.0	5.3	2.4	32.1	0.4	2.0	2.1	2.2
2008-09	MEM	82	10.9	4.3	3.4	30.6	0.3	3.1	1.7	1.8
2007-08	MEM	53	9.4	4.2	2.6	26.1	0.4	2.2	1.7	1.6

Showing regular season · 8 columns. Switch category or scroll sideways for more.

Loading career…

Loading statistics…

Contract

$2.4M over 2026-27 only · $2.4M guaranteed

BOS payroll

Projected surplus

+$1.5M

80% range -$1.2M to +$8.3M

Estimated worth

$4.0M

Against $2.4M in salary

Among contracts

37th percentile

By total surplus, of 406 we can estimate

Projected to be worth more than his salary this season.

Surplus

2026-27Paid $2.4M, worth about $4.0M (likely $1.3M to $10.8M)

Salary
Estimated worth
Likely range (80%)
Gain or loss

Season	Salary	Est. worth	80% range	Surplus	Notes
2026-27	$2.4M	$4.0M	$1.3M–$10.8M	+$1.5M	—

Worth is projected from DRBL wins over 2023-24, 2024-25, 2025-26 (20,001 possessions). Surplus is worth minus salary, after options.

Signed 1-yr minimum contract July 6, 2026.

How this works

Worth is what his projected DRBL wins would cost on the open market. We count wins above a minimum-salary player in the same minutes and price them at what teams paid per DRBL win from 2020-21 to 2025-26: 9.8% of the cap, about $16.2M in 2026-27.

Projections weight his last 3 seasons 3, 2 and 1, newest first, and pull toward what players at his salary usually produce, then adjust for age. Playing time comes from recent minutes, age and salary, since teams play the players they pay. A season lost to injury still pulls the playing time down.

Surplus is worth minus salary. A team can always bench a player, so worth never drops below the minimum salary. A player option leaves the team only the downside, because he walks when he could earn more. A team option or a non-guaranteed year leaves only the upside.

To test it, we refit the model three times, each with only the seasons through 2022-23, 2023-24 or 2024-25, valued what players were actually paid afterward, and compared with what they did. The typical miss the next season was 0.91 wins, against 1.09 for assuming a player repeats his last season. Three seasons out it was 1.18 wins, against 1.54. 12% of players beat the top of the range. Fewer than 2% fell below the bottom, since worth can't drop under the minimum salary.

Cap figures after 2026-27 assume 5.8% growth a year, the recent average. The percentile compares total surplus across the 406 current contracts we can estimate.

Similar players

Closest 2012-13 profiles, historical lookalikes across eras, and nearest comps by metric. This is not a new rating. Switch chips to change the lens.

Closest profiles this season

Jeremy Lin2012-13
4 gapCompare
Why TS -7 · TRB% +7 · DARKO -4
Ty Lawson2012-13
5 gapCompare
Why USG +11 · DARKO -6 · TRB% -6
Goran Dragić2012-13
7 gapCompare
Why DARKO -14 · TS -6 · TRB% +6
Shelvin Mack2012-13
9 gapCompare
Why USG -17 · TRB% +8 · TS -8

Closest profiles historically

Nate Robinson2011-12
7 gapCompare
Why USG +14 · TS -12 · AST% +2
Steve Smith1996-97
9 gapCompare
Why USG +20 · AST% -15 · TRB% +2
Tyrese Maxey2024-25
10 gapCompare
Why USG +30 · TS +10 · DARKO -5
Andrew Nembhard2025-26
11 gapCompare
Why DARKO -25 · USG +14 · TS +11

Profile distance is the average percentile gap across impact, true shooting, usage, assist rate, rebound rate, and DRBL O/D when present. Lower gap is closer. Other chips are nearest on that one stat. Open full player compare

Loading similar players…

Ask DRBL about Mike Conley

Prefills supported peak, rank, season-board, and compare queries only.

Season	Age	Tm	Pos	G	GS	Impact												Profile								Shooting														Defense								Hustle						Advanced
Season	Age	Tm	Pos	G	GS	DARKO	DARKO-O	DARKO-D	RAPTOR	O-RAPTOR	D-RAPTOR	WAR	WAR1	VORP	DRBL/100	DRBL-O	DRBL-D	MP	PTS	TRB	ORB	DRB	AST	TOV	PF	FG	FGA	FG%	3P	3PA	3P%	2P	2PA	2P%	FT	FTA	FT%	eFG%	TS%	STL	BLK	STL%	BLK%	DRB%	DRtg	DBPM	DWS	Defl	Contest	ScrAst	Chrg	Loose	BoxOut	3PAr	FTr	USG%	TOV%	AST%	ORB%	TRB%	AST/TO	ORtg	NET	PER	OWS	WS	WS/48	OBPM	BPM
2025-26	38	MIN	PG	54	15	-0.16	-0.91	0.75	-	-	-	-	-1.3	0.2	-0.9	-1.1	-1.0	18.4	4.5	1.7	0.3	1.4	2.9	0.6	1.6	1.3	4.0	33.5%	1.0	3.1	33.7%	0.3	0.9	32.7%	0.8	0.9	90.0%	46.5%	51.7%	0.6	0.3	1.7%	1.2%	8.2%	116.0	1.0	1.0	1.3	2.1	0.3	-	0.4	0.1	77.2%	0.233	11.5%	12.5%	19.5%	2.0%	5.2%	4.83	120.0	4.0	9.4	0.9	1.9	0.092	-2.3	-1.3
2024-25	37	MIN	PG	71	64	0.25	-0.08	0.33	-	-	-	-	0.6	1.4	0.3	0.5	0.1	24.7	8.2	2.6	0.5	2.1	4.5	1.1	1.6	2.6	6.6	40.0%	1.8	4.4	41.0%	0.8	2.2	38.0%	1.1	1.3	90.0%	53.5%	57.3%	1.1	0.2	2.2%	0.7%	9.3%	113.0	1.3	2.2	2.0	2.2	0.2	0.1	0.4	0.3	66.2%	0.192	14.4%	12.9%	24.5%	2.1%	5.7%	4.09	125.0	12.0	13.3	3.0	5.2	0.142	-0.1	1.2
2023-24	36	MIN	PG	76	76	0.71	0.32	0.39	-	-	-	-	2.5	3.0	0.9	1.8	0.3	28.9	11.4	2.9	0.5	2.4	5.9	1.3	1.7	3.9	8.5	45.7%	2.4	5.3	44.2%	1.5	3.2	48.1%	1.3	1.5	91.1%	59.5%	62.7%	1.2	0.2	2.0%	0.7%	9.0%	111.0	1.4	3.3	2.2	2.5	0.3	0.0	0.6	0.1	62.9%	0.174	16.0%	12.8%	28.4%	2.0%	5.6%	4.54	129.0	18.0	15.8	5.0	8.2	0.180	2.0	3.4
2022-23	35	UTA/MIN	PG	67	66	2.41	1.05	1.36	-	-	-	-	-0.5	1.5	-0.2	0.9	-1.3	30.3	11.9	2.7	0.5	2.2	6.7	1.5	2.1	3.9	9.1	42.8%	2.0	5.2	38.5%	1.9	3.9	48.6%	2.1	2.5	83.4%	53.9%	58.3%	1.1	0.2	1.7%	0.6%	7.9%	116.0	-0.1	1.4	1.8	3.2	0.4	0.1	0.6	0.1	57.5%	0.277	16.3%	13.1%	29.4%	1.8%	4.9%	4.47	130.0	14.0	14.7	4.1	5.5	0.130	1.0	0.9
2021-22	34	UTA	PG	72	72	3.44	2.85	0.58	3.24	2.06	1.17	6.71	2.5	2.7	0.9	1.3	0.9	28.6	13.7	3.0	0.7	2.4	5.3	1.7	2.0	4.8	11.0	43.5%	2.3	5.8	40.8%	2.5	5.2	46.4%	1.8	2.3	79.6%	54.2%	57.2%	1.3	0.3	2.3%	0.9%	8.8%	111.0	0.7	2.3	2.0	3.8	0.3	0.0	0.6	0.3	52.3%	0.205	20.9%	12.5%	27.7%	2.6%	5.8%	3.12	120.0	9.0	17.2	4.4	6.7	0.157	2.4	3.1
2020-21	33	UTA	PG	51	51	0.73	1.19	-0.45	7.09	4.18	2.91	8.42	2.4	2.6	1.2	0.9	1.9	29.4	16.2	3.5	0.7	2.8	6.0	1.9	1.9	5.6	12.5	44.4%	2.7	6.6	41.2%	2.9	5.9	47.9%	2.4	2.8	85.2%	55.2%	58.9%	1.4	0.2	2.3%	0.5%	9.6%	109.0	1.3	2.1	-	-	-	-	-	-	52.3%	0.222	23.1%	12.4%	30.6%	2.7%	6.3%	3.16	123.0	14.0	19.2	4.0	6.1	0.197	3.6	4.9
2019-20	32	UTA	PG	47	41	3.13	2.98	0.15	-0.20	1.36	-1.56	2.02	-	0.8	-	-	-	29.0	14.4	3.2	0.7	2.5	4.4	2.0	2.2	4.9	12.1	40.9%	2.0	5.4	37.5%	2.9	6.7	43.7%	2.4	3.0	82.7%	49.4%	53.7%	0.8	0.1	1.3%	0.3%	9.2%	112.0	-0.4	1.1	-	-	-	-	-	-	45.1%	0.245	23.1%	12.8%	23.1%	2.8%	6.1%	2.20	109.0	-3.0	14.1	1.4	2.5	0.089	0.7	0.3
2018-19	31	MEM	PG	70	70	3.45	3.63	-0.18	6.31	4.61	1.70	10.76	-	3.9	-	-	-	33.5	21.1	3.4	0.6	2.8	6.4	1.9	1.8	7.0	16.0	43.8%	2.2	6.1	36.4%	4.8	9.9	48.3%	4.9	5.8	84.5%	50.7%	56.9%	1.3	0.3	2.0%	0.9%	9.7%	111.0	0.1	2.3	-	-	-	-	-	-	38.0%	0.363	27.3%	9.1%	33.4%	1.9%	5.7%	3.37	117.0	6.0	21.4	5.7	8.0	0.164	4.6	4.7
2017-18	30	MEM	PG	12	12	4.67	4.36	0.30	-	-	-	-	-	0.2	-	-	-	31.1	17.1	2.3	0.0	2.3	4.1	1.5	2.0	5.3	14.0	38.1%	2.0	6.4	31.2%	3.3	7.6	44.0%	4.4	5.5	80.3%	45.2%	52.0%	1.0	0.3	1.6%	0.8%	8.6%	114.0	-0.8	0.2	-	-	-	-	-	-	45.8%	0.393	25.9%	8.4%	22.2%	-	4.2%	2.73	108.0	-6.0	15.4	0.4	0.6	0.077	1.3	0.5
2016-17	29	MEM	PG	69	68	2.78	2.66	0.12	6.22	5.51	0.70	11.57	-	5.1	-	-	-	33.2	20.5	3.5	0.4	3.0	6.3	2.3	1.8	6.7	14.6	46.0%	2.5	6.1	40.8%	4.2	8.5	49.7%	4.6	5.3	85.9%	54.5%	60.4%	1.3	0.3	2.1%	0.8%	10.8%	108.0	0.8	2.5	-	-	-	-	-	-	41.5%	0.365	26.3%	11.8%	34.5%	1.5%	6.0%	2.74	121.0	13.0	23.2	7.5	10.0	0.209	6.0	6.8
2015-16	28	MEM	PG	56	56	3.16	2.54	0.62	1.36	2.24	-0.88	3.63	-	2.2	-	-	-	31.4	15.3	2.9	0.5	2.5	6.1	1.5	1.8	5.3	12.4	42.2%	1.4	3.8	36.3%	3.9	8.6	44.9%	3.4	4.1	83.4%	47.8%	53.8%	1.2	0.3	2.0%	0.8%	9.3%	110.0	-0.5	1.1	-	-	-	-	-	-	30.9%	0.329	22.4%	9.5%	32.7%	1.6%	5.3%	4.07	115.0	5.0	19.4	4.2	5.3	0.144	3.5	3.0
2014-15	27	MEM	PG	70	70	3.93	3.13	0.81	3.11	2.51	0.60	7.36	-	2.7	-	-	-	31.8	15.8	3.0	0.4	2.6	5.4	2.2	2.0	5.6	12.6	44.6%	1.5	4.0	38.6%	4.1	8.6	47.3%	3.1	3.6	85.9%	50.6%	55.8%	1.3	0.2	2.1%	0.5%	9.2%	104.0	0.2	2.7	-	-	-	-	-	-	31.4%	0.282	23.7%	13.6%	28.0%	1.5%	5.4%	2.45	110.0	6.0	18.6	4.2	6.8	0.147	2.6	2.8
2013-14	26	MEM	PG	73	73	4.29	2.98	1.31	3.36	3.17	0.20	8.40	-	3.6	-	-	-	33.5	17.2	2.9	0.6	2.4	6.0	2.1	1.9	6.3	14.1	45.0%	1.4	4.0	36.1%	4.9	10.1	48.4%	3.1	3.8	81.5%	50.0%	54.5%	1.5	0.2	2.4%	0.4%	8.4%	106.0	0.3	2.7	-	-	-	-	-	-	28.3%	0.268	24.6%	11.5%	30.1%	2.0%	5.2%	2.86	113.0	7.0	20.0	5.5	8.2	0.161	3.4	3.8
2012-13	25	MEM	PG	80	80	3.00	2.22	0.78	7.16	3.37	3.79	16.95	-	4.6	-	-	-	34.5	14.6	2.8	0.5	2.3	6.1	2.4	2.1	5.2	11.8	44.0%	1.3	3.7	36.2%	3.9	8.1	47.6%	2.9	3.5	83.0%	49.7%	54.9%	2.2	0.3	3.4%	0.7%	7.9%	100.0	2.3	4.7	-	-	-	-	-	-	31.2%	0.300	21.0%	15.1%	29.5%	1.8%	4.8%	2.54	111.0	11.0	18.3	5.1	9.9	0.172	2.3	4.6
2011-12	24	MEM	PG	62	61	2.14	1.96	0.18	4.10	2.74	1.37	8.57	-	2.4	-	-	-	35.1	12.7	2.5	0.4	2.2	6.5	2.0	2.1	4.8	11.0	43.3%	1.0	2.6	37.7%	3.8	8.4	45.0%	2.2	2.5	86.1%	47.7%	52.3%	2.2	0.2	3.3%	0.4%	7.4%	102.0	1.4	2.8	-	-	-	-	-	-	23.2%	0.231	18.3%	14.2%	29.8%	1.2%	4.2%	3.25	110.0	8.0	16.8	3.6	6.4	0.141	1.0	2.4
2010-11	23	MEM	PG	81	81	0.89	1.49	-0.60	3.09	2.26	0.84	10.08	-	2.3	-	-	-	35.5	13.7	3.0	0.4	2.7	6.5	2.2	2.2	5.2	11.8	44.4%	1.0	2.7	36.9%	4.2	9.1	46.6%	2.2	3.0	73.3%	48.6%	52.1%	1.8	0.2	2.6%	0.5%	9.0%	107.0	0.5	3.2	-	-	-	-	-	-	22.8%	0.259	19.4%	14.2%	28.0%	1.3%	5.1%	2.95	108.0	1.0	15.9	3.4	6.6	0.111	0.7	1.2
2009-10	22	MEM	PG	80	80	0.95	1.08	-0.13	0.10	0.69	-0.59	3.73	-	0.9	-	-	-	32.1	12.0	2.4	0.4	2.0	5.3	2.1	2.2	4.6	10.4	44.5%	1.0	2.7	38.7%	3.6	7.7	46.4%	1.7	2.3	74.3%	49.4%	52.6%	1.4	0.2	2.2%	0.4%	7.3%	112.0	-0.6	1.3	-	-	-	-	-	-	25.5%	0.225	18.4%	15.7%	24.8%	1.4%	4.3%	2.52	108.0	-4.0	13.9	2.6	4.0	0.074	-	-0.6
2008-09	21	MEM	PG	82	61	-1.94	-0.44	-1.50	0.90	0.35	0.55	4.65	-	1.1	-	-	-	30.6	10.9	3.4	0.3	3.1	4.3	1.7	1.8	3.9	8.9	44.2%	1.1	2.6	40.6%	2.8	6.3	45.8%	2.0	2.4	81.7%	50.3%	54.8%	1.1	0.1	1.9%	0.3%	12.5%	111.0	-0.3	1.9	-	-	-	-	-	-	29.7%	0.270	17.9%	14.9%	23.7%	1.2%	6.8%	2.53	109.0	-2.0	14.3	2.7	4.5	0.086	-	-0.3
2007-08	20	MEM	PG	53	46	-2.72	-0.77	-1.94	-2.50	-0.39	-2.11	0.18	-	-0.3	-	-	-	26.1	9.4	2.6	0.4	2.2	4.2	1.7	1.6	3.6	8.3	42.8%	0.6	1.7	33.0%	3.0	6.6	45.3%	1.7	2.3	73.2%	46.2%	50.2%	0.8	0.0	1.6%	0.1%	9.7%	113.0	-1.3	0.5	-	-	-	-	-	-	20.6%	0.278	18.8%	15.2%	25.3%	1.7%	5.6%	2.47	103.0	-10.0	12.6	0.6	1.1	0.038	-1.6	-3.0

Mike Conley

2012-13 percentile ranking

Mike Conley · 2012-13 percentiles

Overview

Impact

Profile

Shooting

Defense

Hustle

Advanced

Season stats

Contract

Similar players

Ask DRBL about Mike Conley

Contract

Statistics

2012-13 percentile ranking

Mike Conley · 2012-13 percentiles

Overview

Impact

Profile

Shooting

Defense

Hustle

Advanced

Season stats

Similar players