Rank my seasons · Regular season
Chris Paul
Each selected season is compared head-to-head with every other; seasons earn points from those matchups. This is not a single universal “best season” score.
Season ranking
Order by points from head-to-head season comparisons (win = 1, = 0.5).
#12008-09
3 wins · 0 losses · 0 even · 3 Copeland pts
Data available:✓ Production✓ Efficiency- Impact- Team context
Most often stronger in: Efficiency, Offense, Production, Rebounding, Role, Availability
#22007-08
2 wins · 1 loss · 0 even · 2 Copeland pts
Data available:✓ Production✓ Efficiency- Impact- Team context
Most often stronger in: Playmaking, Availability, Production, Role, Efficiency, Shooting
#32009-10
0 wins · 2 losses · 1 even · 0.5 Copeland pts
Data available:✓ Production✓ Efficiency- Impact- Team context
Most often stronger in: Efficiency, Shooting, Playmaking, Role
#42013-14
0 wins · 2 losses · 1 even · 0.5 Copeland pts
Data available:✓ Production✓ Efficiency- Impact- Team context
Most often stronger in: Playmaking, Availability, Production
Why 2008-09 ranks first
- 2008-09 wins its overall pairwise comparisons against 2007-08, 2009-10, 2013-14 (3-0).
- Across pairs, its most frequent category edges are: Efficiency, Offense, Production, Rebounding, Role, Availability.
- This is a Copeland aggregation of existing season comparisons, not a universal 'best season' score.
Head-to-head results
Each cell is the row season’s overall result against the column season. Click a cell for the full two-season breakdown.
Open any two-season comparison
Same engine as the matrix. Overall edge goes to the season that won more category comparisons.
- 2007-08 vs 2008-09 · 2008-09 stronger overall
- 2007-08 vs 2009-10 · 2007-08 stronger overall
- 2007-08 vs 2013-14 · 2007-08 stronger overall
- 2008-09 vs 2009-10 · 2008-09 stronger overall
- 2008-09 vs 2013-14 · 2008-09 stronger overall
- 2009-10 vs 2013-14 · essentially even overall