| 54.2% |
| 2015-16 | 6.6 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 52.0% |
Under which conditions does this player change? Rates from Σ/Σ.
Difference vs season baseline (per game / rate). Sample size shown.
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | TS% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 23 | 648 | +1.0 | -0.1 | +0.2 | +2.4pp | 0.0pp | +1.9pp | +0.2 |
| Away | 16 | 462 | -1.4 | +0.2 | -0.2 | -3.7pp | 0.0pp | -3.0pp | -0.3 |
| Wins | 23 | 608 | +0.5 | -0.2 | +0.3 | +3.4pp | 0.0pp | +3.4pp | -0.2 |
| Losses | 16 | 502 | -0.7 | +0.2 | -0.4 | -4.6pp | 0.0pp | -4.6pp | +0.3 |
| Primary splits | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 23 | 648 | 14.7 | 7.3 | 2.2 | 56.1% | 0.0% | 65.5% | 59.2% | 56.1% | 2.7 |
| Away | 16 | 462 | 12.3 | 7.6 | 1.8 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 70.7% | 54.3% | 50.0% | 2.2 |
| Wins | 23 | 608 | 14.2 | 7.3 | 2.3 | 57.1% | 0.0% | 69.7% | 60.7% | 57.1% | 2.3 |
How did performance evolve during the season?
| By month | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | 4 | 115 | 14.0 | 7.8 | 1.3 | 53.5% | — | 83.3% | 58.0% | 53.5% | 2.5 |
| 2012-01 | 12 | 387 | 14.3 | 9.2 | 2.6 | 52.5% | — | 62.2% | 56.4% | 52.5% | 2.8 |
| 2012-02 | 7 | 202 | 11.4 | 5.4 | 1.6 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 58.3% | 52.2% | 50.0% | 2.3 |
PTS per game vs season average · sorted best → worst · G shown
| Opponent | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% | TS% | eFG% | TOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 3 | 79 | 14.3 | 7.3 | 2.7 | 63.0% | 0.0% | 56.3% | 63.2% | 63.0% | 2.3 |
| IND | 3 | 86 | 11.0 | 7.7 | 1.7 | 43.3% | — | 58.3% | 46.8% | 43.3% | 1.7 |
| NO | 3 | 74 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 3.3 | 43.5% | — | 58.3% | 47.7% | 43.5% |
Conservation: Home+Away, Wins+Losses, and Starter+Bench each equal the season game universe when those fields are complete.
| Losses |
| 16 |
| 502 |
| 13.0 |
| 7.7 |
| 1.7 |
| 49.1% |
| 0.0% |
| 63.8% |
| 52.7% |
| 49.1% |
| 2.8 |
| 2012-03 |
| 11 |
| 304 |
| 14.3 |
| 7.7 |
| 2.5 |
| 50.8% |
| 0.0% |
| 78.7% |
| 56.6% |
| 50.8% |
| 2.5 |
| 2012-04 | 5 | 102 | 14.0 | 5.4 | 1.2 | 69.6% | 0.0% | 54.5% | 68.8% | 69.6% | 1.8 |
| 2.3 |
| LAL | 3 | 86 | 12.7 | 6.3 | 0.3 | 48.3% | — | 66.7% | 53.4% | 48.3% | 2.7 |
| CLE | 2 | 45 | 12.5 | 6.0 | 0.5 | 64.7% | — | 60.0% | 65.1% | 64.7% | 2.5 |
| MIL | 2 | 44 | 14.0 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 55.6% | — | 72.7% | 61.3% | 55.6% | 1.0 |
| PHI | 2 | 63 | 18.0 | 11.0 | 3.5 | 57.7% | — | 100.0% | 62.8% | 57.7% | 2.0 |
| ATL | 2 | 72 | 21.5 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 58.6% | — | 90.0% | 64.4% | 58.6% | 2.0 |
| NJ | 2 | 61 | 15.5 | 9.5 | 3.0 | 65.0% | — | 50.0% | 63.5% | 65.0% | 3.5 |
| MEM | 2 | 59 | 14.5 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 45.5% | — | 81.8% | 54.0% | 45.5% | 3.5 |
| SAC | 2 | 42 | 11.0 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 57.1% | — | 100.0% | 66.1% | 57.1% | 1.5 |
| DAL | 2 | 59 | 12.0 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 80.0% | 54.1% | 50.0% | 3.0 |
| POR | 2 | 62 | 7.0 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 29.4% | — | 100.0% | 37.3% | 29.4% | 2.5 |
| LAC | 2 | 60 | 13.0 | 7.0 | 2.5 | 54.2% | 0.0% | — | 54.2% | 54.2% | 3.0 |
| UTAH | 2 | 59 | 21.5 | 6.5 | 2.5 | 64.3% | — | 58.3% | 64.6% | 64.3% | 3.0 |
| CHA | 1 | 21 | 18.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 72.7% | — | 66.7% | 73.1% | 72.7% | 4.0 |
| DET | 1 | 28 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 37.5% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 41.0% | 37.5% | 3.0 |
| GS | 1 | 31 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 85.7% | — | 50.0% | 77.8% | 85.7% | 2.0 |
| TOR | 1 | 34 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | — | 71.4% | 61.9% | 50.0% | 1.0 |
| NY | 1 | 45 | 12.0 | 13.0 | 5.0 | 38.5% | — | 33.3% | 38.4% | 38.5% | 4.0 |
